June 28, 2004

Movin on Up

Posted By: hdouble hdouble

"The room fills with smoke
And I'm already broke
And the dealer keeps on joking
As he takes my last token"

--"Casino Queen", Wilco


I'm not sure how this post is going to come out, but it's definitely a first for yours truly-- two muscle relaxers, a shot of whiskey, and a Heineken... at 30,000 feet. That's right, I'm riding a Pocket Rockets (American Airlines) 777 to Stockholm, with a stopover in old London town on the way. With the laptop battery at 40%, I'm devoting my precious computer time to blogging rather than practicing my shorthanded game on Turbo Texas Hold 'Em.

On the advice of my best friend (Monk, for those loyal readers), I've moved up to the $5-10 6 max games on Party. I've been hemming and hawing for a while now, trying to decide if I wanted to put the entire bank on the line and take a shot at single tabling $15-30, or if there was some other option available. The problem is that the $5-10 full ring games are pretty tight, and what's worse, the tables are always full, so there's a long waiting list. I wouldn't mind waiting a couple minutes, but table selection becomes impossible. Players on the wait list can't be choosers, and with so many fish in the Party waters, waiting for a table is negative EV.

So I've gone ahead and moved up to 2 $5-10 6 max tables, for better or worse. I must confess, this is the only game at Party that shows red numbers in POkerTracker. I haven't played that many hands, but I've thrown away a lot of money by incorrectly adjusting my style for the shorthanded game. In the past, I've been overaggressive, and probably a little too loose preflop, resulting in too many losing sessions.

But that's the past. I spent the week trying to bone up my game, and sat down for my first session on Tuesday night. After winning a monster pot on a flush the first hand, I proceeded to drop around 30 big bets after a few suckouts and a few ill-timed bluffs. Growing pains, let's hope.

The good news is that for the first time in a while, I felt uncomfortable at the virtual table. I didn't feel like the worst player at each of my two tables, but I knew I wasn't anywhere close to being the best. My competitive nature and desire to learn doesn't like this feeling, and I found myself poring over the shorthanded forum on twoplustwo, as well as rereading Abdul's RGP posts on shorthanded play.

The morning after that losing session, I was woken up by a page from work (yes, I was on call last month, but I'm on vacation now so they can shove those pages up their collective arses). After solving the problem, I sat down for 15 minutes and pulled in 20 big bets. At 7 AM LA time. Ahh, the wonders of online poker.

It felt good to win, but more importantly, I thoroughly enjoyed the session. I'm sure all of you know how much of a grind low limit poker can become, and the shorthanded tables really put the gamble (and excitement) back in poker. I found myself anxiously awaiting the showdown, not knowing if my top pair - weak kicker would hold up. In the $3-6 games, it was rare that I didn't know if my hand was good when I was showing it down. I explained this feeling to Monk, and he made an excellent point:

"That's what these guys feel on every hand. For most people, poker is still gambling."

So for the first time in a while, I felt that old poker bug. Anxiously awaiting the next session, waking up in the middle of the night and thinking, "I wonder what the games are like now..." before falling asleep.

One of the main reasons I decided to face the tougher $5-10 games (I truly believe the $15-30 are much softer than the $5-10s) is that I know my shorthanded game needs work. I love to learn, and I think the pursuit of learning has been one of the most enjoyable endeavors in my life (yeah, I went to a liberal arts school). The shorthanded games are "new" for me, and provide me with an opportunity to master a new game. I'm sure that this is the reason I find myself wanting to play more.

So at the moment, I'm still a big loser shorthanded. But that'll change. I may not have confidence in my shorthanded game, but I have plenty of confidence in my ability to learn... so I believe it's just a matter of time. Let's just hope the cards are kind while I'm climbing the learning curve.

Monk and I are planning to hit the Stockholm casino as many times as possible. The dollar is so bad right now that I'll have to have a good night just to break even, but hey, it's vacation.

The stewardesses are coming around with dinner, and my battery is dying. And I think the alcohol and muscle relaxant combo is kicking in. Does this make me a member in some sort of pathetic, mile-high blogging club?

Thanks for reading and stay focused...


Posted by hdouble at June 28, 2004 11:28 AM | TrackBack

Maximize your profits: learn how to use the most powerful tool in online poker.
Comments

Hdouble- I'm interested in why you think the 15/30 games are softer than the 5/10 games.

Posted by: Monte Christo at June 28, 2004 08:17 PM

Have fun in Sweden mister Double.

Posted by: Poker Penguin at June 28, 2004 09:38 PM

Nice post. Looking forward to following your progress at the 5/10 tables. Oh, and come back a winner.

Posted by: glyphic at June 30, 2004 03:08 AM

Yes take notes so we can all live vicariously through you!

:)

Posted by: Doug at June 30, 2004 11:35 AM

i'm imagining you and monk on a heavy diet of smoked herring and vodka. or whisky. or whatever the hell they drink over there.

have a blast, hank, and have a cold one on me.

Posted by: iggy at June 30, 2004 06:19 PM

Hank-

Been meaning to stop by the 3/6s for a while on PP to watch you have your way with the fish (who, as that guy "coach" says, surely refuse to capitulate), but have been unable to locate you, even those you show up as online. Now that you're playing SH 5/10, I'm even more intrigued. Are you hiding from the search, or am I just an idiot?

Enjoy the trip across the pond, and beat the tar out of the poker rooms over there -- exchange rate be damned.

-Kevin

Posted by: Kevin at July 1, 2004 09:45 PM

HDouble,

I love your blog.

When you get time.....(or any of you other bloggers who comment here and read this)
Please discuss the affect of rake kickbacks or bonuses or whatever the hell they offer you to your bankroll and how successful you'd be without them.
I'm interested to see if anyone who isn't a blogger or churning out referrals is making any money and how much it cuts into your profit.
I like many many others, just pay the rake. Can I win?

Posted by: JMan at July 8, 2004 04:01 PM

Yes. You can make money even if you pay the rake.

At 3/6 on PartyPoker, you'll pay between 40 and 50% of your winnings in rake, even if you have no rakeback deal.

This percentage will increase or decrease, but most of all depending on the stakes you play. The higher stakes you play, the more insignificant the stakes become, and the lower stakes you play, the more unbeatable the game becomes. (At 50¢/$1, with a $3 max rake, no hand is playable on its own merits; even AA is worth only around $2.25. The only reason that game is profitable is that your opponents are very, very, very, very, very bad.)

Posted by: Lord Geznikor at July 9, 2004 02:08 AM

Bah, my drunk ass can't type anything right.

The higher stakes you play, the more insignificant the RAKE becomes, that was what I meant to say.

Posted by: LordGeznikor at July 9, 2004 02:10 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Play Online Poker