|
January 22, 2006World Poker Domination and Bankroll Considerations
Posted By:
"It's important that someone celebrate our existence... People are the only mirror we have to see ourselves in." Now that's what I call a hiatus. It's been two months since I last posted here, and it feels much longer than that. The main reason for the lack of updates is that I don't have all that much to say about poker these days. Most likely that's because I feel like I haven't had the time to relax and let my mind bounce off all of the input and process it into something more interesting. Working too many hours leaves me with little time to even get a good night's sleep, let alone play poker. Luckily, I have a group of great people who come to my house and force me to think about poker: the weekly Friday night home game has kept my game from deteriorating completely. It makes me somewhat sad that the intensity and regularity of my poker play is a far cry from what it once was, but I know I'll get back to it when I get more time. Hail to the Victors To illustrate this, I quote from his blog from a home game long ago: "Last week I got so dehydrated that I was verging on heat stroke and had to throw up in the main bathroom's blissfully cool porcelain masterpiece of a toilet. Yeah, yeah. You can laugh all you want, motherfuckers, because I did not miss a hand." Not only did he not miss a hand, but he played the next hand just as well as he usually does. Awareness, focus, and concentration. Congratulations Ryan, I couldn't think of someone who deserves victory more. (amusing side note: Ryan consistently outplays most people in the homegame, but somehow always manages to suffer horrible beats and many undeserved losing nights. For those of you who think short-term results matter, please take note.) And that's not all... Factgirl beat out 700 players in best online poker site's $16K guarantee to take down over $4K in prize money. And she took most of my chips in an appearance at Friday's homegame and cruised to a victory chop. Congrats, Facty, without your careful study of the game, victory would not be yours. Observations from outside the aquarium The most important lesson I've learned in the past couple months is that the biggest difference between players at middle limits and above is the relationship between a poker player and his bankroll. While players often overvalue hands and have minor differences in skill, the biggest difference I see among players is their attitude about winning and losing money. Personally, I feel like I grew into my bankroll-- in Los Angeles, the $15-30 games aren't all that much different than the $3-6 games online, so skill and bankroll have strange proportions in the city of angels. While my poker skills were ready for the $15-30 games in terms of skill, mentally it was very difficult to accept the variance that comes at that level, and downswings took their toll mentally. Luckily I come from a good statistical background, and my start as a card counter helped me understand and accept these downswings. But these days my bankroll is pretty healthy, and variance is a good friend of mine... or at least I understand her pretty well. It is one thing to accept the idea that you are going to have 100 big bet downswings every once in a while, and another thing to have gone through it a few times. Believing in statistical theory requires supreme confidence that you are a better poker player than those you play against-- not an easy thing during your first 100 bet downswing. But if you are a consistent winner night after night, it's much easier to shake off a few losing sessions. A simpler way to say this is: Losing hurts more when it makes you question your poker skill. Understanding your opponent's relationship with his bankroll can sometimes help you determine the correct play against that opponent. For example, a recreational player who is happy to lose a few hundred bucks for a night of fun is more likely to call your value bet on the river with a weak hand "just to see what you have". Below is an attempt to categorize the most common player-bankroll relationships that I have come across. I'm sure these types apply to online players, but it's probably impossible to figure out who's who unless you can see what your opponents look like. 1. The recreational gambler 2. The high roller 3. The gentleman gambler 4. Scared money 5. The properly bankrolled player 6. The overly bankrolled player *** Many poker players spend extensive amounts of time thinking about the game, but little time considering the way that their bankroll affects their play. I think that at the higher limits, bankroll considerations are often the biggest difference among players. Understanding how much money you are really willing to lose at the poker table without having serious financial consequences is an important and underrated part of serious poker. Posted by hdouble at January 22, 2006 04:45 PM Maximize your profits: learn how to use the most powerful tool in online poker. Comments
Has homeboy ever considered drinking some water? Count me in as a #6. Great post Hank! Posted by: Drizztdj at January 24, 2006 07:49 AMwow, I've been playing low limit online for about 6 months now. My biggest buy-in is when I grind $10 bucks to play Wil's weekly tourney. But I float between 4,5 and 6. #5 is where I try and keep myself, I work up, trying to keep 150 BB for the level I am playing. If I lose to 100BB I drop down a level and if I get to 100-150 BB for the next level I move up and stay REALLY tight until I get to the sweet spot at 150BB again. But your description of #6 nailed me. I am amazed that when I am over bankrolled for the level I am playing I get REALLY offended by a beat and can tilt quicker than when I am slightly under bankrolled for a level. Very cool post. Posted by: Chaswell at January 25, 2006 07:15 AMGreat Post, Thanks Posted by: eTerrible at January 27, 2006 10:49 AMAfter reading this post, it makes kinda puts me back in check with my bankroll. I get on a hot streak, and what usually happens is I raise the bet and play in stakes outside my comfort zone. It is impossible to play my game when I put myself under that kind of pressure. It's funny, now that I think about it I have played outside my comfort zone and I would say maybe 8 out of those 10 sessions were losers. However, one of the 2 sessions that I won I took a guy for $8k in a no limit game. After I trapped him the first time with my nut straight, his nose was wide open and to my delight he went on tilt and I took him on off. If only every night could be like that one. Posted by: offyourface at January 27, 2006 09:59 PMNice post - I'm another one of those #6 guys. But your post has spurred me on and I'm going to take the plunge and jump up a limit or two. I'm looking forward to becoming a #4 in the near future. Posted by: Klopzi at February 2, 2006 03:11 PMYet another #6 here. I loved your opening quote. In fact, the header of my blog also has a quote from Bujold. Great post. -DrC Posted by: DrChako at February 8, 2006 12:49 PMPost a comment
|